| Overall Rating |
 |
|
| Description |
| Z3 is desirable, enjoyable and carefully crafted. It's perhaps the most distinctive small sportster in recent years, and it's more affordable now that the more muscular Z4 has replaced it. |
|
| Handling |
|
|
| Comfort |
|
|
| Quality & Reliability |
|
|
| Performance |
|
|
| Roominess |
 |
|
| Running Costs |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
|
| NCAP |
| Not tested |
| Best Models |
| 2.2, 3.0 |
| Worst Models |
| None |
| Replacement |
| by Z4 in 2003 |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| The two-seater Z3 roadster has bags of style and a strong image. Its position as a fashion icon has suffered since its replacement by Z4. Even so, its styling, neat packaging and BMW prestige put it ahead of MGF, Mazda MX-5 or Toyota MR2. Z3 succeeds because it's not a traditional hairy-chested sports roadster. There's a playfulness about its design details that makes it more of a lifestyle item, and it can be accessorised from a huge options list. These factors probably explain why it's just as popular with women drivers as with males. Smaller four-cylinder 1.8 and 1.9 engines are popular and eager enough, but it takes the six-cylinder units (2.0 and above) to really bring the rear-wheel drive Z3 into its own. Handling is balanced with a taut chassis and precise steering. Ride is smooth but not soft, and overall refinement is good with the hood up. |
| Positive Points |
- Great presence for a small sports car
- Inherits 3-Series engines and handling
- Well built, reliable and affordable to run
|
| Negative Points |
- Some critics reckon that it?s overstyled
- Expensive alongside MGF or MX-5
- Only really sparkles with bigger engines
|
|
Sign In | Sell My Car » 
